Useful Doctrines from Cybernetics and Cognitive Science
Below are the philosophies, principles, and hypotheses I find essential when researching human-level AI and translating cybernetics and cognitive science into machine learning.
Philosophy
-
“What I cannot create, I do not understand” (Feynman)
To truly understand a phenomenon, one must be able to reconstruct its mechanism from the ground up. -
“What is it like to be a bat?” (Nagel, Uexküll)
Non-human qualitative experiences—such as a bat’s echolocation—can never be fully captured by a human third-person objective description. Jakob von Uexküll’s concept of the Umwelt highlights that each species’ unique perceptual world never completely overlaps with another’s.
Hypotheses / Principles
-
Bayesian Brain Hypothesis (Helmholtz, Hinton, Doya)
The brain treats sensory inputs as probabilistic models and updates them according to Bayesian rules, building on Helmholtz’s notion of unconscious inference. -
Free Energy Principle (Friston, Parr, Pezzulo)
Living systems minimize variational free energy to reduce prediction error and maintain stability. Parr and Pezzulo extended this into the theory of active inference. -
Emergence, Holism, and Gestalt Principles (Koffka, Bertalanffy, Anderson)
- “The whole is more than the sum of its parts.” (Kurt Koffka)
- Systems holism (Ludwig von Bertalanffy)
- “More Is Different.” (Philip W. Anderson)
Complex systems exhibit novel properties that cannot be deduced solely from their individual components.
-
Computational Irreducibility (Turing, Wolfram, Chaitin)
Certain processes cannot be predicted without simulating every step of their computation, as shown by the halting problem, algorithmic randomness, and cellular automata research. -
Law of Requisite Variety (Ashby, Boisot & McKelvey)
To regulate external complexity, a system’s internal variety must match or exceed that of its environment. Organizations must design both the quantity and structure of their internal complexity to meet environmental demands.
Comments